Mad Over Donuts is facing a fresh legal challenge after the Bombay High Court issued notice over its GST treatment, with regulators alleging the company has been charging incorrectly. The dispute raises a wider question for eateries selling packaged foods like cookies, chocolates, and bread: should these items attract 18% GST or a different tax rate?
Sun Pharmaceutical has won a trademark dispute in Bombay High Court, which barred Meghmani Lifesciences from using the drug mark “Esiraft.” The court accepted Sun’s claim that Meghmani’s “Esiraft” is visually and phonetically similar to Sun’s “Raciraft,” creating a strong likelihood of consumer confusion and amounting to infringement and passing off.
Your news, in seconds
Get the Beige app — every story in 60 words, updated hourly. Free on iOS & Android.
A Ghatkopar East homebuyer who bought five apartments in Bhandup discovered the builder had sold refuge (vacant) areas as residential flats. The High Court found the occupancy certificate plan contained an error showing those spaces as flats on specific floors, yet still denied the buyer society membership, leaving the dispute unresolved for him.
In a major relief for employees, the Bombay High Court ruled that EPFO cannot deny higher EPS pensions just because an employer’s records are incomplete. The court said EPFO must use every verification option available before rejecting claims. The judgement favours workers who paid contributions on actual wages but were refused due to document lapses by employers.
The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition against WeWork India’s IPO after the petitioner, Rishab Agarwal, withdrew the case. Agarwal’s challenge had claimed the company failed to fully disclose regulatory complaints. With this withdrawal, the latest legal attempt targeting WeWork India’s IPO disclosure statements has effectively ended, following earlier rejections of similar pleas.
The Bombay High Court discharged four individuals in the 2006 Malegaon blast case, ruling there was insufficient evidence to proceed to trial. The NIA is reviewing the decision but is not expected to file an appeal. The case has been marked by conflicting investigations, with the ATS and NIA presenting divergent narratives.
Never miss a story
Set alerts for the topics and sources you care about. Download Beige for free.
A Bombay High Court decision involving a widow’s case against CDSL may have wider fallout for investors. The ruling could allow many client claims tied to broker defaults involving major depositories CDSL and NSDL. If leveraged, wronged account holders may find new legal pathways to seek restitution, potentially reshaping how such failures are handled in India’s market infrastructure.
A Mumbai employee acquitted of bribery charges won a partial legal victory but still failed to get full back wages for his suspension. The Bombay High Court held that a criminal acquittal does not automatically entitle an employee to full pay, particularly when the suspension arose from allegations tied to involvement in criminal proceedings.
The Bombay High Court has barred a Navi Mumbai drugmaker from using the brand names “Absun” and “Absun Pharma,” siding with Sun Pharmaceutical Industries. In a long-running trademark dispute, the court ruled the competing names are deceptively similar to Sun Pharma’s established marks, potentially confusing consumers. The verdict effectively ends the decade-long legal battle.
Swipe through stories, personalise your feed, and save articles for later — all on the app.