Lenders defending the Jaiprakash Associates bid process before the NCLAT say selecting Adani Enterprises was fair and transparent. They rejected Vedanta’s late addendum offering more money, arguing it violated the pre-set bidding framework and would have prolonged delays. The hearing centers on claims that the process was tailored versus competitively handled under the original timelines and terms.
Vedanta Group has moved to challenge the insolvency outcome that selected Adani Enterprises’ bid for Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. Vedanta says its offer was higher, but the insolvency appellate tribunal will review whether lenders used correct evaluation metrics. Lenders argue several factors shaped the choice, while Jaiprakash’s value spans real estate, cement, and hospitality assets.
Your news, in seconds
Get the Beige app — every story in 60 words, updated hourly. Free on iOS & Android.
In the insolvency case of Jaiprakash Associates, the resolution professional told the NCLAT that Vedanta was never formally declared the highest bidder. The only evidence cited was an email showing the highest financial value discovered, not an official bid award. Vedanta’s petition is being argued as lacking legal and factual backing.
Swipe through stories, personalise your feed, and save articles for later — all on the app.
